Environment

In Defence Of BP

June 21st, 2010

I worked at one of the big multinational oil companies doing environmental work. I spent millions of dollars cleaning up environmental spills, and I never encountered any evil. I know the stories, I’ve seen Erin Brockovich, but that wasn’t my experience working for a big oil company.

A coworker of mine was preparing for a public meeting to discuss an environmental clean-up. Being the voice of Big Oil at a public meeting is a nightmare. A mob mentality can take hold, plus you have to deal with the personification of that character from the Simpsons, who shouts, “What about the children?! Won’t somebody please think of the children!?” I thought it would be funny for him to open his comments by asking, “By a show of hands, how many of you rode bicycles to the meeting tonight?” I still think that’s funny.

Oil is our way of life, yes yours too. We have a complex world wide network of infrastructure and technology to find, extract, refine, transport, and use petroleum products. It is the largest single industry in the world and it is woven into every aspect of our lives from how we get our food to why we don’t sit in the dark. I understand the urge to curse the oil industry, but the soapbox you are trying to get up on is plastic, it’s made of oil. This is not an industry problem, it’s a human one.

Do you know how people choose where to buy their gas? Location and price. People buy gas at a station that is on the way to or from work, or they drive a little further to save a few pennies per litre. No one pays more for gas based on the environmental performance of the company selling it.

The BP spill will be analyzed, problems will be identified, guilty parties will be named, new procedures will be put in place, but it’s all sort of irrelevant. We all understand that continuing to get oil out of the ground is not making grass greener and water cleaner, so where does all this indignant shock come from? You and I are the reason men are drilling for oil more than a mile under the ocean, so our hand wringing and finger pointing is disingenuous, because none of us rode bicycles to this meeting.

Vote for Reader Favorites No Votes Yet
Loading ... Loading ...

Kill Bottled Water

April 27th, 2009

Introduction

I don’t accost people on the street drinking bottle water, “Hey! Do you feel good about yourself? Earth killer!” I wanted to say that because the following article may sound zealous, but I am not. Drink bottled water or don’t, either is fine with me.

This is a rework of Against Recycling Plastic Bottles. I wrote it as a speech for a Toastmasters competition, which is the reason for the conversational zealous tone. I won, which is surprising. So, although the article is repetitive to those of you who come back here regularly, it’s won an award. Award winning you could call it, if you were so inclined.

Kill Bottled Water

Any biological system must find a balance or it collapses and the living things within it die. Greenhouse gases, air quality, water quality, coral reefs, rain forests, biological diversity, and species extinction, we are pushing all of these factors, and more, in a negative direction. Every living system on the planet is in decline.

Recognition that our current path cannot continue does not require extremist views. We all agree that things could improve, so, we need to make changes. I am here to convince you to make one. I want you to kill bottled water.

red_bleeding_water_bottleIt takes 3 litres of water to produce one litre of bottled water.1 The energy required is equivalent to filling up each bottle a quarter of the way with oil. Plastic bottles take 700 years to begin to break down.2 Ninety percent of the cost of bottled water is the bottle and cap.3 There are higher health and safety standards for the water that comes out of your tap. The bottled water industry has no redeeming features.

You recycle though, right. I mean, you’re not some heathen. Great, but recycling plastic bottles is a flawed concept. There is no utopia of recycling where all water bottles can be recycled and reborn as the next generation of bottles. Canadians are responsible for a billion plastic water bottles a year and one hundred percent of them are new. If you recycle a plastic bottle, it cannot be made into a new bottle.

What happens to the recycled bottles? That plastic will last for hundreds of years, but not as a bottle. The material is downgraded and must be made into other things, like the filling in jackets. When the parka is worn out guess where it goes? You have not changed the fate of the plastic bottle, just delayed it a few years. If you recycle a plastic bottle, the material still ends up as garbage.

We behave as though a recycling bin is a gluttony confessional that forgives all of our sins. I have read varying estimates about what percentage of plastic bottles are recycled. Thirty percent, twenty, it could be as low as ten percent4. My question is, who cares? If you are burning bundles of money to keep warm, the efficiency of the furnace you are using is not the point. We cannot continue to buy products that don’t make sense, and try make ourselves feel alright about it by recycling.

Bottled water does not make sense. Putting it in a blue bin does not change that. The answer is not to recycle an object. The answer is to recognize that we don’t need to make it at all. If bottled water disappeared tomorrow, the environmental benefits would be huge and the negative impact on your life would be zero.

I am not an extremist or a rabid environmentalist, and I am not asking you to be one either. You don’t need to make a picket sign or take part in a march. I am not suggesting that you give up your car. I am suggesting that you sacrifice a harmful and needless convenience. Stop buying bottled water.

Pepsi and Coke made $45 billion5 last year bottling water and other products. What impact do you think recycling has on their profits? The companies that produce the billions and billions of plastic bottles each year don’t care what happens to all that plastic. It has no impact on their revenue. You only influence large corporations when you make their environmental choices part of your buying decisions.

To affect a huge multi-billion dollar industry just stop buying their product, you won’t be alone. Bans against bottled water have been put in place in Nelson, Waterloo, Toronto, London, Charlottetown, and St. John’s. People are starting to pay attention to this issue because it is a small but winnable victory. This is not going to fix our environmental problems, but it will be a sign of change.

We should wipe out bottled water on behalf of the one in eight people on the planet that don’t have access to clean drinking water. We should stop buying it to send a message that being environmentally responsible is important. We should stop producing it to help the environment. We should stop bottled water to demonstrate our common sense.

This product results in significant environmental harm. This product does not need to exist. You don’t need bottled water. I don’t need it. No one needs it. Lets kill bottled water.

Alternatives

water

Permanent Containers

If you are using bottled water for convenience, replace it with a metal container, and fill it up with tap water. A good quality aluminum or stainless steel bottle will last indefinitely. There is no evidence to support claims that drinking out of aluminum is harmful in any way, but if you are at all concerned, get stainless steel. Outdoor activity stores like MEC usually has a good selection of styles and uses ranging from insulated to infant cups.

Filtration

Water tastes different depending on the minerals it contains which vary from place to place. If taste is your reason for drinking bottled water try a filtration option. Filtered water in a permanent container is a good alternative to bottled water. There are many different systems that vary in complexity and function. Keep in mind the potential need to dispose of and replace filters, which will offset some of the environmental benefits you are trying to achieve.

Larger Containers

If you are going to buy water in plastic containers remember that bigger is better. The larger the container the less waste you produce for the same volume of water.

References

Giving Bottles a Second Life – NY Times

Plastic Bottle Recycling Is A Dying Dream – Tree Hugger

Tap water popularity affects Pepsi – NY Times

How bottled water could drink Canada dry – Polaris Institute

Is bottled water safer than tap water? – CBC

Calculations for the cost of bottled water – Tree Hugger

Backlash against bottled water – Vancouver Sun

Sailing the Great Pacific Garbage Patch – TED

Plastic Bottle Recycling Estimates

Bottled water bans: Vancouver, Toronto, London, Charlottetown, Owen Sound, St. John’s, Long Island, NY City, San Fransisco, Seattle, United Church of Canada. If you find others feel free to add it to the comments.

Footnotes

  1. Estimates vary. I have read a reasonable looking calculation that claims the figure is closer to 6x, so 3x is conservative []
  2. The estimates for bio degradation of PET plastic varies []
  3. Considering the minimal processing required to put tap water into a bottle this is a believable figure, and one that is fun to quote, so I have used it. However, even though the figure is all over the internet, I freely admit I can’t find a good source for how it was arrived at. []
  4. See articles under the Reference heading for sources []
  5. Published financial statements for Coca-Cola Company and Pepsi Bottle Group []
Vote for Reader Favorites No Votes Yet
Loading ... Loading ...

Against Recycling Plastic Bottles

April 16th, 2009

plastic-water-bottleI am not a rabid environmentalist. You will not find me chained to a tree, or carrying a “save the whales” sign. Recognition that our current path cannot continue does not require extremist views, it simply requires a grasp of basic high school math and biology. Any closed biological system must find a balance or it collapses and the living things within it die.

Human beings are pushing our system out of balance in a time frame unprecedented in the Earth’s history. Greenhouse gases, coral reefs, rain forests, biological diversity, air quality, water quality, species extinction, erosion, we are pushing all of these factors and more in a negative direction. Every living system on the planet is in decline. A correction in these trends is inevitable.

Recycling to the Rescue

The symbol has become pervasive. Blue boxes, bins, and bags are everywhere inviting you to recycle your unwanted mess. Doing so makes you feel like you are doing your part. The problem is that we are accomplishing nothing.

Short-term thinking is my issue with recycling. It is accomplishes two things: First, it makes us feel like we are doing something. Second, it ensures that we do not really have to deal with the fundamental issues. We do not need to fix our problems, we just need to delay the crisis until we are dead.

Bottled Water

Bottled water is a great example to illustrate my point. Bottled water is a unnecessary industry. No one needs bottled water. People over 30, like myself, can remember the birth of bottled water. If you had told us 20 years ago that we would buy water in little bottles at more than twice the price of gasoline we would have rejected the idea as ridiculous. Yet here we are.

A huge industry like that producing bottled water has an impact on the environment. Shipping, packaging, marketing, factories, and plants all burning energy to produce green house gasses, industrial water and air discharge. If bottled water disappeared tomorrow, the environmental benefits would be huge and the negative impact on your life would be zero.

Canadians drink half a billion dollars of bottled water a year. We do so for a variety of reasons: perceptions of quality and safety, and convenience being high on the list. We drink our bottled water and feel OK about it because we recycle.

That is short term thinking. We have created a temporary container out of a permanent material. That plastic bottle will last, in one form or another, for hundreds of years. That material will not be recycled and remade into a useful object for a few hundred years. Even if you put that bottle in a blue bin, the material is eventually going to end up garbage.

The process begins immediately with a fact that few people seem to know. One hundred percent of plastic beverage containers are brand new. There is no utopia of recycling where all water bottles can be recycled and then be reborn as the next generation of bottles. That circle of arrows that represents the recycling industry is a lie. If you recycle a plastic bottle, it cannot be made into a new bottle. It must be downgraded to something else, like carpets or filling in pillows.

Bottled water is just an easy whipping boy because it is so obviously harmful and devoid of any value, but it represents the bigger picture. Temporary things create our entire lifestyle. Take out containers, coffee cups, paper napkins, packaging, and IKEA furniture. The bookcase you bought from IKEA can only be moved twice before it breaks down into fragments of particle board. How many objects in your home have been made to outlast you? More than five years? Why not?

The Solution

Continuing to buy products that don’t make sense, and trying to make ourselves feel good about it by recycling, is delusional. Producing bottled water does not make sense. Putting it in a blue bin does not change that. The answer is not to recycle an object. The answer is to recognize that we don’t need to make it at all. Recycling is not the answer. Producing less is.

If our product choices really affected our lives, we would make different ones. We will refuse to support any product that produces waste. Starbucks must design a coffee cup we can bury in our flower boxes as fertilizer. McDonalds needs to package their burgers in something our dog can eat. We, of course, will buy a cup that will last our whole life and simply drink our water out of the tap.

Environmental change currently appears optional. The environmental choices we make do not directly and immediately affect our health, our standard of living, or our pocket book. The effects are slow and easy to overlook. We need to make them immediate and pronounced.

We are destroying the place we live, but we are going about it in such a half assed manner that we are fooling ourselves into thinking progress is being made. We are taking part in a massive industrial orgy of one time use convenience products. There is no point in being coy about it.

We are addicted to a way of life that will kill us. We need to hit bottom so we realize the mess we are in. The faster we get there the better, so let’s quit messing around and do it already.

Throw everything out. Lets have plastic bottles up to our necks and push things to a point where throwing out a bag of garbage costs as much as your rent. Change created by altruism is lovely, but it is painfully slow. Change due to necessity is quick and decisive. They say it is the mother of invention, so lets generate some necessity.

Vote for Reader Favorites No Votes Yet
Loading ... Loading ...

Environmentally Friendly isn’t easy

April 7th, 2009

environmental_cleanerMy wife is making an effort to switch to more environmentally friendly cleaning products. When commenting on the new oven cleaner she expressed disappointment.

There is a reason chemicals are in everything. They are highly effective. Chemicals will get your oven shiny in no time, but if you replace that skull and bones label, indicating it is toxic to everything in touches, with a globe, or a tree, or a fluffy bunny, the contents require an additional ingredient to work.

Stupid environment.

Vote for Reader Favorites No Votes Yet
Loading ... Loading ...

An Argument Against Recycling

February 5th, 2008

Sustainable Living

There are a number of graphs below. Not to worry this article will not involve a bunch of math. For now just look at the shape of the graphs. You could use a lot of words to describe that shape, but sustainable does not come to mind. Exponential growth can continue off into infinity in pure math, but no real world system can support it. The graphs show the growth in U.S. energy consumption, world wide species extinctions, and human population.

I am not a rabid environmentalist. You will not find me chained to a tree, standing behind a barricade, or carrying a “save the whales” sign. Recognition that our current path can not continue does not require extremest views, it simply requires a grasp of basic high school math. Any closed biological system must find a balance or it collapses and the living things within it die. Human beings are pushing our current system way out of balance in a time frame unprecedented in the Earth’s history. Greenhouse gases, coral reefs, rain forests, biological diversity, air quality, water quality, species extinction, erosion, we are pushing all of these factors and more in a negative direction. Every living system on the planet is in decline. A correction in these trends is inevitable.

But we recycle

The symbol has become pervasive. Blue boxes, bins, and bags are everywhere inviting you to recycle your unwanted mess. Doing so likely provides you with an unconscious little shot in the arm; a good “I’m doing my part” feeling. Except we are not really accomplishing much.

Short term thinking is my issue with recycling. It is a band-aid approach that accomplishes two basic things: First, it makes us feel like we are doing something. Second, it ensures that we do not really have to deal with the fundamental issues. By recycling we push the bubble forward. We do not need to fix our problems, we just need to delay the crisis until we are dead.

Evian anyone?

We sell water. So we have to be clever. – Jeff Caso, Nestle exec

Bottled water is a great example to illustrate my point. Bottled water is a completely unnecessary industry. No one needs bottled water. People over 30, like myself, can remember the birth of bottled water. If you had told most of us 20 years ago that we would eventually buy water in little bottles at more than twice the price of gasoline we would have rejected the idea as ridiculous. Yet here we are.

A huge industry like that producing bottled water has an environmental impact. Shipping, packaging, marketing, factories and plants, industrial water and air discharge. If bottled water disappeared tomorrow, the environmental benefits would be huge and the sum total effect on our general quality of life would be minuscule.

Canadians drink more than 700 million liters of bottled water . We spent about half a billion dollars on it.1. We do so for a variety of reasons: perceptions of quality and safety, and convenience being high on the list. We drink our bottled water and feel OK about it because we recycle.

That is short term thinking. We have created a temporary container out of a permanent material. That plastic bottle will last, in one form or another, for hundreds of years. The odds of that material being constantly recycled and remade into a useful object for a few hundred years are zero. Whether you throw that bottle in a blue bin or not the material is eventually going to end up garbage. We are enjoying our comforts and pushing the problem further down the line.

We throw over 500 billion plastic shopping bags every year world wide2. Again, a permanent product providing a very temporary service. The average grocery bag must be in use for all of 30 minutes. Do you know what would happen to us if we simply stopped producing plastic bags? Nothing. Obviously we would find a way to get our food home. There is no reason why we can not simply produce permanent containers that are designed to be, well, permanent. Of course Grocery Store Inc. is not going to stop providing bags to their customers, and customers are not going to stop expecting them.3 The bags are extremely cheap to produce which is why the dominate the market. Besides what is the big deal. We recycle.

Bottled water and plastic bags are just easy targets and visible examples of our disposable economy. We do this with everything. Our entire lifestyle is built on temporary things. Take out containers, coffee cups, paper napkins, and packaging. Do you think you are going to pass that bookcase you bought at IKEA down to your grand children? That stuff can only be moved twice before it breaks down into a loose jumble of particle board. How many objects in your home have been made to outlast you?

An Argument Against Recycling

The answer is not to recycle an object. The answer is to recognize that we don’t need to make it in the first place.

Ou addiction is not a sustainable concept. A plan to reduce consumption slowly does not change the ultimate result. It is a lifestyle that must be abandoned. We will eventually be forced into making fundamental changes to the way we interact with the place that keeps us alive, and no blue box is going to change that.

We need to hit bottom. Lets quit messing around and do it already. Throw everything out. Lets have plastic bottles up to our neck. Lets take those landfills with a 40 year life cycle and fill them up in 10. Lets push things to a point where throwing out a bag of garbage costs as much as your rent. Change created by altruism is lovely, but is is painfully slow. Change due to necessity is quick and decisive.

Environmental change currently appears optional. The environmental choices we make do not directly and immediately affect our health, our standard of living, or our pocket book. The effects are slow and easy to overlook. We need to make them immediate and pronounced.

If what we used and what we threw out really affected our lives there are all sorts of things we simply will not do anymore. We will absolutely refuse to support any product that produces waste. Starbucks is going to have to come up with coffee cups we can bury in our flower boxes as fertilizer. McDonalds needs to package their burgers in something our dog can eat. Grocery stores will have bulk items we put into containers we bring from home. We of course will buy a nice cup that will last our whole life and simply drink our water out of the tap.

We will eventually hit the realization that our lifestyles are not sustainable, but the longer we take to do so the more damage we cause. We are slowly destroying the place we live. We are going about it in such a half assed manner that we are fooling ourselves into thinking progress is being made. I propose a massive industrial orgy of one time use convenience products. Lets hit bottom and do it with gusto.

We have decided that a system that extracts oil from the ground, ships it to a refinery, turns it into plastic, shapes it into a spoon, trucks it to a store, sells it to a consumer, who uses it once and throws it out, is better than a system that requires you to wash the spoon.

Related Posts

A further argument against recycling: Against Recycling Bottled Water

A better research article about the environment: Peak Oil Crisis

References and further reading

Is Landfilling Plastic Bottles Greener than Recycling? – Greenbiz.com

The Clean Bin Project – A couple tries to produce zero waste for a year.

The Sixth Extinction – Washington Post, January 13, 2008

Summary Statistics for Globally Threatened SpeciesThe International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources

CBC article on bottled water

CNN article on bottled water

What Is The Real Cost Of Bottled Water? – environmentalgraffiti.com

How to save the world – zenhabits.com

Footnotes

  1. 1999 figures []
  2. Extrapolated from data released by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in 2001 on U.S. plastic bag, sack, and wrap consumption. Source: National Geographic News September 2, 2003 []
  3. This is no longer true. Lots of places have now stopped using plastic bags, like the grocery store in our neighbourhood, which underlines how often I am wrong. []
Vote for Reader Favorites No Votes Yet
Loading ... Loading ...