Science

Science vs Jenny McCarthy

March 26th, 2012

Recently, on television, a sitcom star from the eighties debated an expert in cancer research on the merits of modern medicine’s approach to fighting cancer. The star was Suzanne Somers, who played the ditzy blonde third of “Three’s Company”, a half hour comedy that ended in 1984. Somers has since penned a number of self help books, acted as the spokeswoman for “The Thighmaster”, and currently advocates medical treatments criticized by numerous credible sources, including the American Cancer Society.

This isn’t intellectual snobbery. You don’t have to have an advanced degree to appreciate that you should be listening to the American Cancer Society, over Suzanne Somers. Right?

People do listen to Suzanne Somers’ advice on their health. Why is that? Everyone has an opinion, but not all are equal weight. I’m with Science on this. I’m always with Science.

If I push you over, your ass will hit the ground. How long that takes, and how hard you land, is predictable, measurable, and consistent. Age, race, language, spirituality, political views, language, ideology, your entire belief system, is irrelevant. If I push you over, your ass will accelerate towards the ground at exactly the same speed regardless of what you believe. It works the same for every person and thing, in every place. Gravity doesn’t care what you believe. That’s a reality we all share. That’s Science.

Human life expectancy has more than doubled in the last hundred years. Science did that. Not ancient wisdom, not good parenting, not herbal remedies, not belief or religion, it was Science and modern medicine that doubled the amount of time people get to listen to fools on television.

Jenny McCarthy was Playboy Playmate™ of the year in 1993. That’s how she became well known. She went on to host a dating game show on MTV, then acting roles, and wrote several books. She’s beautiful and funny, no doubt. She also has opinions that contradict Science.

Jenny McCarthy says there is a link between vaccinations and Autism. She claims the vaccination for measles, mumps, and rubella, which has prevented the deaths of an estimated 1.4 Million people1, causes Autism. She knows this because of her experience as a mother, as proof she cites studies which the Scientific community have thoroughly discredited.

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” – Isaac Asimov

My nephew has Autism. Great kid. You don’t have to spend much time with him before you understand there’s lots more of him locked inside. You get this because his disorder ebbs and flows. It’s like a thing that fights him.

My sister and her husband are intelligent people, educated intelligent people who have an autistic son. I can’t imagine how frustrating it is to hear advise from well meaning people prefaced with, “I saw Jenny McCarthy on Oprah, and she says, …”. I’d find it difficult to be patient.

No one knows what causes Autism, it’s likely not one thing. It’s a multi layered problem that requires expertise ranging from Nutritionists to Neuroscientists. Research is going on all over the world, but there are still more questions than answers. Science doesn’t have the answer to Autism, but I can assure you, neither does Jenny McCarthy.

It’s going to take many people, so much smarter than you or I, working hard in universities, laboratories, and hospitals, to find the keys needed to loosen the grip of my nephew’s disorder. People doing that work aren’t getting famous or rich, and they may or may not be pretty. There are not many Scientist working on treatments for Autism, or Cancer, or Alzheimer’s, or any disease, that would qualify to pose for Playboy magazine, or host a dating game show on MTV. But luckily, those aren’t relevant qualifications for doing advanced medical research.

Value the opinion of talk show hosts and models at your peril. At all our peril, really, because ignorance has an impact. Childhood diseases we thought we eradicated are making a come back, and becoming immune to the few antibiotics we have to treat them, because people are choosing not to vaccinate their kids based on fear and the opinion of someone who’s qualifications end at being lovely.

There are answers to Autism. People practicing good Science, will find them. The problems we face are complex, and the scope of human knowledge is vast. Solutions can not be found if we abandon facts, evidence, and rational thought as crucial to their discovery, or put our faith in people who should be eliminated from the discussion through the application of common sense. I suggest, as a good solid guideline for adult life, that you do not take medical advise from a Playmate™.

Resources

Autism – Centers For Disease Control And Prevention

The danger of Science denial – Michael Specter (TED Video)

MEASLES, MUMPS, AND RUBELLA VACCINATION AND AUTISM – New England Journal of Medicine – evidence points to no link

Immunization Safety Review: Vaccines and Autism – Institute of Medicine: No connection between MMR vacines or thimerosal and autism

NY TImes – Three separate trials determine that thimerosal, a preservative containing mercury, does not cause autism.

Responding to a fourth trial judgment that dismisses a connection between vaccinations and autism, advocacy group Autism Speaks, who has previously supported the idea of a connection, released a statement: ”While we have great empathy for all parents of children with autism, it is important to keep in mind that, given the present state of the science, the proven benefits of vaccinating a child to protect them against serious diseases far outweigh the hypothesized risk that vaccinations might cause autism,”

 

Footnotes

  1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16528234 []
Vote for Reader Favorites 1
Loading ... Loading ...

Guns Blazing

September 7th, 2009

Our doctor is a proponent of a complete mind body approach. He recommends several complimentary programs while undergoing fertility treatments. We took part in a comprehensive package called Lifestreams which includes acupuncture, yoga, counseling, and a dietitian. I think of it as the “fire all guns” tactic.

Acupuncture

I wasn’t present for the acupuncture, but Michelle said it was interesting and relaxing. She had four sessions and would recommend it.

We had a private session with a lovely woman for yoga. It was calming and we both enjoyed it. Lots of stretching that Michelle could do now, and when she is pregnant. She also might go to the yoga for fertility classes.

We sat down and told our story to a counselor who was nice, and helpful. She gave Michelle tips for relaxation and for how to keep her sanity during the 12 days between Implantation and the Pregnancy Test. It was a reassuring hour we spent talking to someone who understands and is interested in how this is affecting our lives.

We spent an hour reviewing our eating habits, well Michelle’s, I can eat Cheezy Puffs three meals a day and it makes no difference. The dietician kept things simple, gave us good background information, and made some easy suggestions on how to improve our diet. We both think it was time well spent, and Michelle went on to read a book she suggested.

Under the advanced medical science category, Michelle underwent a uterine biopsy. Normally they are used to obtain a tissue sample for testing. In this case it was done on the chance it would help Michelle get pregnant. There is some preliminary data that suggests this may increase the success rate of IVF. The risks are minimal and it looks promising, so the doctor recommended it, and we agreed.

Michelle finds her work stressful, and this is already difficult, so she has taken three weeks off work for this attempt. It’s good to feel like we are holding nothing back, that everything that can be done, is. It sets us up for an even bigger fall, but worrying about that is no way to think. If IVF beats us again we are going down swinging.

Science Stuff and Resources

Limited evidence points to a possible link between uterine biopsies performed prior to an IVF cycle increasing the odds of a pregnancy. Further studies are being conducted, nothing is conclusive yet, but initial data seems promising. The biopsy holds limited risk and some doctors are offering it to their patients prior to the results of a large scale study being conducted to prove the positive effect.

Vote for Reader Favorites 1
Loading ... Loading ...